And they said, 'Yep.' And that was pretty much the conversation.īy this point, Dan Brown sounds like he trusts his filmmaking collaborators.
I saw the first draft and said, 'Hey, the ending is different.
.png "inferno dan brown movie trailer")
I'm working with great filmmakers and I can just sort of sit back and know that I'm in good hands. This was much more direct, right to the point of it. I know that the novel had a subtle, ambiguous ending. During an exclusive press event in Florence, Italy, I was able to ask Dan Brown about the change, and why he allowed it, and he told me:Īnytime you're going to adapt a novel into a movie, a movie that is not 25 hours long, some things are going to have to be simplified. Ron Howard opts for a happy ending where Tom Hanks and his team reach the bomb and stop it from exploding. It's a grim, but realistic, ending to the book, and one that the movie jettisons. But he learns, through the World Health Organization, that it's a vector virus, meaning that it will only trigger DNA modification to cause sterility in one-third of our planet's population. In the book, Langdon fails to prevent the virus from being released. STOP reading now, again, if you don't want to know. and the way the movie handles the resolution is VERY different from the way it's concluded in the book.
Sienna Brooks (Felicity Jones) are racing the clock to unearth a man-made plague that threatens half of the planet's population. Harvard symbologist Robert Langdon is back in action this weekend when Inferno hits theaters, and it reunites Tom Hanks with Ron Howard for the third time.
0 kommentar(er)
